I just find it easier to setup and maintain, really. Philosophically, they are similar, with Fedora being minimal, but you get things like gcc, python, and othe

I just find it easier to setup and maintain, really. Philosophically, they are similar, with Fedora being minimal, but you get things like gcc, python, and other items by default, which is nice. Fedora doesn't come with LibreOffice, games, or anything like that. I only used yum on CentOS, and I thought it was okay. Fedora now comes with DNF which is pretty close to pacman. Don't get me wrong, I like Arch a lot still and have no complaints, but I felt like Fedora struck a nice middle ground, and is, by default, very close to how I set up my Arch system anyways, even closer with the LXDE spin. edit to add: I still use the Arch documentation for just about everything. That's one area that no one can say Arch is deficient on.