3 ms·
I'm biased: use a full PaaS. I like Cloud Foundry because I've worked on it. OpenShift is another alternative.
by jacques_chester 11y ago
I'm biased: use a full PaaS. I like Cloud Foundry because I've worked on it. OpenShift is another alternative.
- DannoHung 11y agoPretty sure openshift v3 is built on top of kubernetes
- zwischenzug 11y agoYes: Docker, Kubernetes, and etcd
- jacques_chester 11y agoAnd Cloud Foundry can run Docker containers. The point is that both are platforms. Application developers shouldn't really need to care about the internals of a PaaS, for the same reason that I don't really care about the internals of the Linux kernel.
- olalonde 11y agoI've been using Deis (http://deis.io/ http://deis.io/) which is built on top of Docker and inspired by Heroku. I think it's a bit more "lightweight" than Cloud Foundry but really pleased so far. I had a few issues but the Deis team was always quick to help and fix bugs.
- jacques_chester 11y agoIf you want a lightweight Cloud Foundry, try Lattice[0]. It's specifically intended to allow developers to experiment with the core Cloud Foundry components (routing, scheduling/placement and log draining) with very low overhead. [0] http://lattice.cf/ http://lattice.cf/