2 ms·

I am about to go read the article, but after owning a 6s+ for the past couple weeks, I will give a few impressions first: * Very very very large (this is a b

I am about to go read the article, but after owning a 6s+ for the past couple weeks, I will give a few impressions first: * Very very very large (this is a big-ass phone), * Very very very very fast, * Some good options in the UI for heavier Mac style 'fuzzy' text, * Battery life is barely dented after a typical day of surfing and texting occasionally at work, * Phone is 'slippery' and I have to use a special grip, wrapping fingers around it to hold it securely, * Camera is fantastic, with people asking me 'what lens' are you using, assuming I'm on my Nikon SLR, * Fingerprint unlocking is here, and works perfectly. All in all, it's an incredible leap from the iPhone 4S I had before. $900+ is a LOT for a phone though.

IkmoIkmo 11y ago
> $900+ is a LOT for a phone though. Absolutely, but also, sort of not. After all, you'd want a decent phone, that sets you back say around $200 nowadays. The $700 then is really the premium you're paying. Now you mentioned the 4S. It's still worth $100, whereas the resale value on a $200, 4 years later, is probably pretty much zero in comparison. So now you're paying a $150 premium per year for the top of the line phone. Per month it'd be about $12.50 to have the latest tech instead of say the Moto G (sweet entry level phone). Is that excessive or a lot? Well if you're earning a few k a month and you're on your phone 10% of the time, not really. Comparing it to say the cost of your car, your food (a $12.50 lunch), your entertainment (a $12.50 movie ticket) etc, puts it into perspective. Anyway don't get me wrong, I'm on an iPhone 4 myself haha. I just don't have a need right now and raised on little, $12.50 is substantial when your disposable income is near zero, so I totally get it's a lot. But for a large portion of Americans who are on their phone a lot, the cost-benefit for this purchasing decision is tremendously positive. Isn't the base model $750 btw instead of $900? Pretty sure it was. Of course you'd need to buy a plan as well.

IkmoIkmo 11y ago

> $900+ is a LOT for a phone though. Absolutely, but also, sort of not. After all, you'd want a decent phone, that sets you back say around $200 nowadays. The $700 then is really the premium you're paying. Now you mentioned the 4S. It's still worth $100, whereas the resale value on a $200, 4 years later, is probably pretty much zero in comparison. So now you're paying a $150 premium per year for the top of the line phone. Per month it'd be about $12.50 to have the latest tech instead of say the Moto G (sweet entry level phone). Is that excessive or a lot? Well if you're earning a few k a month and you're on your phone 10% of the time, not really. Comparing it to say the cost of your car, your food (a $12.50 lunch), your entertainment (a $12.50 movie ticket) etc, puts it into perspective. Anyway don't get me wrong, I'm on an iPhone 4 myself haha. I just don't have a need right now and raised on little, $12.50 is substantial when your disposable income is near zero, so I totally get it's a lot. But for a large portion of Americans who are on their phone a lot, the cost-benefit for this purchasing decision is tremendously positive. Isn't the base model $750 btw instead of $900? Pretty sure it was. Of course you'd need to buy a plan as well.