4 ms·
> there was no meltdown Except that there totally was a meltdown. * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster#Core_meltdowns https://en
by peckrob 11y ago
> there was no meltdown
Except that there totally was a meltdown.
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster#Core_meltdowns https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disa...
* http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/201706-muon-scans-confirm-complete-reactor-meltdown-at-fukushima-reactor-1 http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/201706-muon-scans-confirm...
* http://blogs.wsj.com/japanrealtime/2015/09/29/fukushima-watch-near-complete-meltdown-confirmed-at-reactor-2/ http://blogs.wsj.com/japanrealtime/2015/09/29/fukushima-watc...
> the issue was resolved without having to permanently evacuate any area around the plant.
Except for the 20 mile exclusion zone that is still in place.
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_reaction_to_Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_reaction_to_Fukushima...
* http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/worldnews/11916879/Inside-Fukushimas-nuclear-disaster-exclusion-zone-in-pictures.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/worldnews/1...
I'm not an anti-nuclear person by any means, but let's not sugarcoat this disaster. It was bad.