3 ms·
> Backup tapes and cassette tapes are obviously a completely different thing, lets not even go there. Backup tapes are cassette tapes. Audio cassettes and back
by laumars 11y ago
> Backup tapes and cassette tapes are obviously a completely different thing, lets not even go there.
Backup tapes are cassette tapes. Audio cassettes and backup tapes are different (not "completely" as the technology is actually quite similar), but backup tapes are magnetic tapes that come in cassette cartridges. They quite literally are cassette tapes.
> Yes, fax machines are still used. That doesn't make them not obsolete.
I guess that depends on your definition of "obsolete". Google defines it as "no longer produced or used" and fax machines are still manufactured and -as I described before- used quite common. So definitely not obsolete.
It should be noted that I wasn't advocating the use of fax, but I feel the need to address your other points since you've posted quite a specific and one sided opinion on facsimiles:
> Fax is ridiculously slow
Sending a fax isn't slower than having to manually scan your documents and then email the resulting PDF. Which is the main usage I see it still being used for. In fact in many instances, the alternatives to fax are more laboured even though the actually communication protocol for fax is slow and outdated.
> [Fax] requires both participants to have fax machines
An endpoint is required with all communication mediums. Even e-mail would require the recipient to have an e-mail address. Plus your point is moot when talking about technology that has already been adopted. If anything, the reason fax is still used is because people already have one so make use of it.
> [Fax is] super insecure.
This is sadly very true. It is probably the best reason not to use fax but it's also worth baring in mind that even for all it's flaws, fax is still no less secure than a telephone conversation (let's all replace telephones with something! :p) or the depressingly high number of SMTP servers who don't default to TLS. Thankfully that e-mail criticism is now changing at a significant pace.
---
Please be mindful that I'm not trying to advocate the usage of fax machine nor magnetic tapes. The tone of your arguments would suggest that you think I am promoting their usage, but I'm really not. I'm just being pragmatic about things. :)
- digi_owl 11y agoDo wonder how hard it would be to bolt a key exchange on top of existing fax protocols.
- laumars 11y agoInteresting thought. It wouldn't surprise me if this had already happened so that sensitive government offices could share information before the widespread adoption of the internet.
- kstenerud 11y ago> Backup tapes are cassette tapes. Audio cassettes and backup tapes are different (not "completely" as the technology is actually quite similar), but backup tapes are magnetic tapes that come in cassette cartridges. They quite literally are cassette tapes. You're trying to score "argument points". Stop that. The article was using it in the colloquial sense. They even had pictures. They're obviously talking about audio cassettes, not backup cassettes.
- laumars 11y agoGood grief, "argument points", seriously? It was a discussion, both parties expressed their views. I wasn't trying to score "argument points" any more than anyone else in this conversation. I was just discussing my own perspective. To elaborate: I was just commenting that the same technology is still in widespread use so it's still proving itself to be valuable in some infrastructures. From my perspective it seems odd to differentiate between audio and backup tapes since audio cassettes are really a subset of that technology (the magnetic tape was originally designed for computer data storage back in the mainframe days, albeit cassette form came quite a bit afterwards). So my point was that the technology itself is still widely used. Personally I never liked audio cassettes, not even in the 80s. So I wasn't going to comment on why some people might be using that specific application of the technology.