4 ms·
In a hypothetical where the government doesn't exist to provide justice, "vigilante justice" would be the only justice. Whether vigilante justice is preferable
by stavrianos 11y ago
In a hypothetical where the government doesn't exist to provide justice, "vigilante justice" would be the only justice. Whether vigilante justice is preferable to a total absence of justice is the question.
More generally, the whole point of vigilantism is going outside the established judicial framework. If there is no such framework, the concept of vigilantism is meaningless.
As to what prevents/discourages this behaviour, the answer is mostly going to be "the presence of an existing judicial structure, backed by force, which disallows such behaviour".
- JoeAltmaier 11y agoCan't we define 'vigilante' to be a response that's not commensurate with the crime? A lack of justice, if you will. In that view, its quite debatable if no justice would not be better.
- douche 11y agoNo, because that's not what the word means, nor what it is generally held to mean by prior precedent.
- JoeAltmaier 11y agoWe're using different dictionaries then. Vengeance would seem to agree with my definition. noun 1. a member of a vigilance committee. 2. any person who takes the law into his or her own hands, as by avenging a crime. adjective 3. done violently and summarily, without recourse to lawful procedures
- oldmanjay 11y agoyou are definitely not getting the support you think from those definitions. vigilantism fairly clearly has nothing to do with a commensurate response.
- JoeAltmaier 11y agoSo 'avenge' doesn't ring any bells with you? True justice is not about vengeance. In America, we have specific clauses forbidding 'cruel and unusual punishment'.
- oldmanjay 11y agoThat was an example. The definitional clause preceding it was the important part. Also, you surely aren't going to convince me that your personal interpretation of a common word is correct by being snotty with me about it.
- JoeAltmaier 11y agoI'm sorry it seemed that way to you. I try to be concise in writing. If it has an emotional tone, its not because I meant to put it there. The adjective form of vigilante spells out violent and summary action. Summary action is often incorrect action which would not be commensurate with the (non-existent in that case) crime. Violent action is not the usual response of the justice system, so again it would be a response not commensurate with the (real this time) crime. That definition seems to support my original description pretty well!
- talmand 11y agoVigilante justice is usually about the people choosing to enforce laws that they feel the government is choosing to not enforce. Vengeance usually has nothing to do with the law or its enforcement. Say a heinous murder is committed and the perpetrator has been discovered. Vigilante justice is a person, or group, taking the perpetrator into custody and punishing them because they don't like that the government refuses to do so for some reason. Vengeance is a person, or group, taking the perpetrator into custody and punishing them even if the government wishes to do the same.
- ZenoArrow 11y agoIf you're getting hung up on the word vigilante (which has been the case for most people who replied to my earlier comment it seems), replace the word 'vigilante' with the word 'street', i.e. street justice. Note my intended meaning hasn't changed, only the way I'm choosing to express it. Now what prevents street justice in a society without government intervention? The (simplified) answer is self-organised defence organisations. Is a mob/gang boss a preferable means of protection in a community, compared to those means that can be put in place by an elected government?