4 ms·
That needs to have been taken out of context. Probably what they insist on, is that there is this Gordon valuation model, which, long-term, should apply to any
by harperlee 11y ago
That needs to have been taken out of context.
Probably what they insist on, is that there is this Gordon valuation model, which, long-term, should apply to any company that gives a dividend, and it's based on this idea that for a company to be worth anything for a minority investor without any control of the company, it needs to have a dividend - which is the only return on investment that such investor will receive, apart from profit for selling in the future.
- JoeAltmaier 11y agoNah, simply blind insistence that there every stock is worth only what its dividend pays. I don't know why he thought that; but apparently the idea has currency. Look at the comments to this thread!