4 ms·
Declassified CIA documents detail how to sabotage employers, annoy bosses
- rasur 11y agoThis would explain a few of the places I've worked at :(
- isoos 11y agoThe original of the document seems to be open since 2012: https://www.cia.gov/news-information/featured-story-archive/2012-featured-story-archive/simple-sabotage.html https://www.cia.gov/news-information/featured-story-archive/... I'm wondering how much it would take to invert every item, and turn the guide document into management best practices.
- raverbashing 11y agoAlso it originates on the OSS (the precursor to the CIA)
- hga 11y agoAnd given that the OSS was infamous for being populated with high social status corporate types, "Oh So Social" was one variant it was called, we can be very sure they learned these methods, one way or another, in the organizations they came from, so it's inherently useful either way.
- cm2187 11y agoMy employer has been heavily infiltrated!
- vijayr 11y agoI wonder how many of us reading this are nodding their heads and saying the same thing! Either there are too many spies in the workforce, or the agency needs to up it's tactics. Perhaps starting with "keep fiddling with your phone in meetings", "put Annoy-a-tron in your boss' room" etc.
- weland 11y agoShit man, at this point I'm wondering if I'm not actually working for the CIA's industrial sabotage training department. That list is basically an SoP.
- sigsergv 11y agoSome points from original PDF: Make "speeches." Talk as frequently as possible and at great length. Illustrate your "points" by long anecdotes and accounts of personal experiences. Never hesitate to make a few appropriate "patriotic" comments. When training new workers, give incomplete or misleading instructions. Do your work poorly and blame it on bad tools, machinery, or equipment. Complain that these things are preventing you from doing your job right.
- chetanahuja 11y agoSo... Either this is an inside joke or basically every company in America (and very likely everywhere) is a CIA front.
- violentvinyl 11y agoSo the CIA invented Change MAnagement back in 1944 then?
- devonkim 11y agoThey seem to have done most of the ITIL 2.0 taxonomy. Service desk, CMDB, service catalog, and it wouldn't take much more for a PPM document.
- sigsergv 11y agoMade a readable version of original document part related to office work: https://gist.github.com/sigsergv/4ef7760bce859c67e298 https://gist.github.com/sigsergv/4ef7760bce859c67e298
- paulus_magnus2 11y agohigher quality version http://www.simplesabotage.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Original-Manual.pdf http://www.simplesabotage.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Ori...
- signa11 11y agocia in 1944 how is that possible ? the agency was founded in 1947...
- lsaferite 11y agoIn the first paragraph on the linked page > In 1944, CIA’s precursor, the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), created the Simple Sabotage Field Manual.
- cryoshon 11y ago"When possible, refer all matters to committees, for "further study and consideration." Attempt to make the committees as large as possible - never less than five. Bring up irrelevant issues as frequently as possible. Misunderstand orders. Ask endless questions or engage in long correspondence about such orders. Quibble over them when you can. Haggle over precise wordings of communications, minutes, resolutions. Be unreasonable and urge your fellow-conferees to be "reasonable" and avoid haste which might result in embarrassments or difficulties later on. Don't order new working' materials until your current stocks have been virtually exhausted, so that the slightest delay in filling your order will mean a shutdown. To lower morale and with it, production, be pleasant to inefficient workers; give undeserved promotions. Discriminate against efficient workers; complain unjustly about their work. Fill out forms illegibly so that they will have to be done over; make mistakes or omit requested information in forms. Spread disturbing rumors that sound like inside dope." Seems like items 1-4 are strongly in effect at most places I've been to, unintentionally of course. The statements on committee-forming and pedantic wording ring particularly true, and I fear that these things are what people are learning from each other. You don't need a committee or meeting for most decisions, and the wording seldom matters so long as the spirit is there for internal documents.
- elcct 11y agoI like when government "wants" to solve some problem and instantiate a committee... it straight away means that they won't do a thing.
- dsfyu404ed 11y agoThis is less of a how to sabotage and more like a list of productivity killing things they acknowledged were killing productivity and a suggestion that they can be applied in the context of sabotage. While unsurprising, it's mildly amusing.
- woodman 11y ago11.a.5: "Haggle over precise wordings of communications..." "productivity killing" is exactly what sabotage is, be it cutting railroad track or persuading telephone operators to randomly drop calls. You just said that sabotage is sabotage applied in the context of sabotage :)
- mring33621 11y agoDogbert? Is that you?
- mariodiana 11y ago"Pay every employee, whether good or bad, 70 thousand a year."