6 ms·
> Western Europe or Japan: two very different cultures, both higher-density than the US, both tend to have higher social cohesion than in America, not lower. I
by Pyxl101 11y ago
> Western Europe or Japan: two very different cultures, both higher-density than the US, both tend to have higher social cohesion than in America, not lower.
It's a lot easier to have "high social cohesion" when you have a uniform culture that's been around for centuries, and are not living in a nation of immigrants from all over. I have nothing against that, by the way, but I'm simply pointing out that many countries like Japan are fairly xenophobic at best, racist at worst. I believe there was an article on HN recently about how difficult it is to found a start up in Japan as a foreigner.
Plus, I'm not sure this kind of tight-knit culture is something I'd want to be a part of: http://www.kalzumeus.com/2014/11/07/doing-business-in-japan/ http://www.kalzumeus.com/2014/11/07/doing-business-in-japan/
> The company is your public life. Have an issue with your landlord? The company will handle it, in those cases where the company is not your landlord.[...] Need to file paperwork with City Hall? Someone from HR can do it for you.
> The company is your private life. All friends you’ve made since your school days almost by definition work for your company, because you spend substantially every waking hour officially at work or at quote leisure unquote with people from work.
That sounds to me like modern-day feudalism.
----
> Do you know what liberty is? It's letting the market have a say in how dense developments can be
What's wrong with the people in each area voting for the laws that govern their area? If the people in an area don't want to vote for an increase in density, then so be it. Let them live their lives how they want to.
- TulliusCicero 11y agoYes, those societies are different, obviously. My point was just that it's certainly possible to have high social cohesion even with dense urban living. > What's wrong with the people in each area voting for the laws that govern their area? There's nothing necessarily wrong with localities having their own laws, of course. I'm not advocating for overthrowing democracy, I'm just arguing that overly restrictive anti-density regulations have had a number of bad impacts: - In desirable metros, skyrocketing property values caused by restrictions on new housing supply act as a large wealth transfer from the young to the old. - Needing to use a car hurts the poor, hurts college students, hurts childrens' independence, and hurts residents' healthiness. - Lower density developments are more energy- and thus carbon-intensive. - Wasted time on long commutes because the only affordable housing is far away is a huge economic sink. - The economy overall is weaker because many people avoid moving to high-productivity areas like Silicon Valley or NYC, and instead go to lower-productivity cities, because of high housing costs caused by a lack of supply: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp/2014/07/25/how-big-cities-that-restrict-new-housing-harm-the-economy/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp/2014/07/25/h...
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]