You can have your cake and eat it, when you have one cake at the edge of the antarctic continent (where ice meets liquid seawater) and another cake in the middl

You can have your cake and eat it, when you have one cake at the edge of the antarctic continent (where ice meets liquid seawater) and another cake in the middle of the continent (where you could increase temperature by 30C and not melt anything at all). I fail to see how "part of Antarctica sees increased snowfall due to raising temperature" is an evidence against AGW. At best, its an evidence against cartoon-version strawman AGW where every corner of the world warms up by an equal amount and every ice in the world starts to slowly melt away at the same pace.