3 ms·

Until it is the CEO..CTO..and vc that is standing under the bridge...nothing will change.

• roel_v 11y ago
  How would they know whether the bridge is designed badly? What's the reasoning behind your underlying suggestion?
  • TeMPOraL 11y ago
    The reasoning is, I guess, that it's usually not engineers that introduce serious problems and vulnerabilities to software, but management and sales introducing unreasonable demands and not caring about the product any more than how much money it brings.
  • lazyjones 11y ago
    > How would they know whether the bridge is designed badly? It's their responsibility. If it's not possible for them to comprehend the design and execution thoroughly enough, they'd better make sure they had someone check it whom they can trust to understand it. Like ancient builders, who didn't lay every stone themselves, but were still responsible for the outcome. Perhaps our standards for responsibility of leaders are a little low these days.