4 ms·
It's actually much easier to falsify the "this is a bad thing" part. All we have to do is wait and see if it really is a bad thing or not. The length of time to
by Asbostos 11y ago
It's actually much easier to falsify the "this is a bad thing" part. All we have to do is wait and see if it really is a bad thing or not. The length of time to wait should be about 100 years since that's also the limits of most of the AGW predictions.
Your point (1) has a huge assumption about "kill us off". There's no sign that mankind is being killed off. We're doing just fine. The novel mechanism might be transient and the increases in CO2 might be found to reverse.
- yongjik 11y agoI don't know about you, but if the universe has a hidden inexplicable mechanism that started to slowly increase the temperature of the Earth fifty years ago, I would be very, very worried. Like, frog-in-a-slowly-boiling-pot worried. Sounds like you would actually prefer that scenario to the mundane scientific consensus, where all we have to do is demolish the fossil fuel industry, cut back CO2 emission, and hopefully we could keep the number of displaced people in the order of several millions by the end of this century. Well, to each his own.