5 ms·

Everyone ? In the off-change that you are not auto-gasslighting yourself try browsing in incognito mode: http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2015/noaa-analysis

Everyone ? In the off-change that you are not auto-gasslighting yourself try browsing in incognito mode: http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2015/noaa-analysis-journal-science-no-slowdown-in-global-warming-in-recent-years.html http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2015/noaa-analysis-journ... http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jun/04/global-warming-hasnt-paused-study-finds http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jun/04/global-wa... http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2015/06/15/a-pause-in-global-warming-not-really/ http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2015/06/15/a-pause-in...

semi-extrinsic 11y ago
Ehm, no. The pop-sci reporting on that study had a very misleading title; the pop-sci report in Science was titled "Evidence Against a Global Warming Hiatus?" based on the scientific paper titled "Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus" Also, that is a single paper, based on adjusting historical temperature data for a single data set, which then shows less of a hiatus. Compare that to the fifth IPCC report, based on a large number of data sets and a very large number of studies, which states unequivocally “[global temperature] has shown a much smaller increasing linear trend over the past 15 years [1998-2012] than over the past 30 to 60 years.”