3 ms·
According to test engineers at Ericsson, the first iPhone was "a crappy phone" [0]. It routinely dropped calls [1, 2]. It also didn't have 3G or MMS, something
by sorenjan 11y ago
According to test engineers at Ericsson, the first iPhone was "a crappy phone" [0]. It routinely dropped calls [1, 2]. It also didn't have 3G or MMS, something most if not all other phones had at the time. But apparently it was good enough, did other things well, and could be updated and replaced. That's a major difference between consumer electronics and cars.
[0] http://www.techsite.io/2015/10/16/ericsson-engineers-thought-iphone-was-a-crappy-phone/ http://www.techsite.io/2015/10/16/ericsson-engineers-thought...
[1] http://www.pencomputing.com/reviews/apple_iphone_3months.html http://www.pencomputing.com/reviews/apple_iphone_3months.htm...
[2] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/31/AR2009073100971.html http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07...
- jfoutz 11y agoAnd yet, it seemed to do pretty well.
- kamaal 11y agoIt was perceived to do very well. And that is the only thing that counts. That's the same thing today too.
- timcederman 11y agoMy second mobile phone was an Ericsson GH688. I spent an obscene amount of money on an Ericsson T68 when they first came out. The iPhone was better than any Ericsson phone I ever owned, as a phone (I owned a total of 8 Ericsson phones).