3 ms·
I have noticed a recurring theme with YC companies. Many of them....let's just say that they weren't selected for the strength of their technical implementatio
by downandout 11y ago
I have noticed a recurring theme with YC companies. Many of them....let's just say that they weren't selected for the strength of their technical implementation or people skills. A good example of this is Magic. This is a site that few people probably remember, but they raised $12M at a $40M valuation after 2 weeks in existence back in March. More than 7 months after raising this money, the company, whose entire business model is dependent upon people sending them SMS messages detailing the things that they need or want, has yet to place a tappable SMS link on its home page.
The simple fact of the matter is that money from VCs and/or an endorsement by YC speaks only to the potential of the idea and the pedigree of at least one founder. Nothing else seems to even be considered, even when writing eight figure checks. Given this situation, no one should be surprised that YC companies sometimes go off the rails like this.
- DrMJG_HN 11y agoYou might dislike Ycombinator because of whatever reason from the past, but Ycombinator is overall by any objective measure very successful in building companies. Am not saying this just because I was in Ycombinator - if you are honest to yourself you will agree.
- klapinat0r 11y agoWould you mind elaborating on "because I was in Ycombinator"? Typo or did something change during today?
- downandout 11y agoI said nothing about disliking YC. I said their selection criteria very obviously does not include technical ability or people skills.