I'm not at work, so I can't see the relevant articles, but I notice the linked study uses satellite altimetry. I'd be interested in the numbers for complementa

I'm not at work, so I can't see the relevant articles, but I notice the linked study uses satellite altimetry. I'd be interested in the numbers for complementary techniques, in particular, gravitational mass anomalies from GRACE. Here's a link to an older comparative study: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/igsoc/jog/2010/00000056/00000200/art00020 http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/igsoc/jog/2010/0000005... My understanding is that GRACE still was seeing Antarctic mass losses, but perhaps that has changed.