I'm for nuclear power, and think it's the height of idiocy for groups opposed to global warming to have supported the removal of nuclear before coal. I was jus

I'm for nuclear power, and think it's the height of idiocy for groups opposed to global warming to have supported the removal of nuclear before coal. I was just pointing out that there is a cogent rationale for why this time could be different. Perhaps we could replace fossil fuels, but we haven't, yet. And until we do we're still in the same 200+ year energy cycle that started around Malthus' time. The poster I was replying to seemed to think there was literally no reason that Malthus might be right. He's not certainly right, but he's not certainly wrong yet either.