3 ms·
The usual process is to conspicuously red-line a contract, so your changes are clearly visible (traditionally, highlighted in red ink), along with a notificatio
by _delirium 11y ago
The usual process is to conspicuously red-line a contract, so your changes are clearly visible (traditionally, highlighted in red ink), along with a notification up front that you're sending back a revised contract.
From the article it's not entirely clear to me what form his modifications took:
> [He] scanned it into his computer, altered the terms and sent it back to Tinkoff Credit Systems.
By this do they mean he did something like "photoshop" the scanned contract, producing a result that looks as similar as possible to the original, but with some parts digitally modified? That would be a bit more misleading, if so.
- jsprogrammer 11y agoMy guess is that he wanted substantially similar terms, except for a few modifications. It's far easier to modify the existing contract than to write up an entire new one in that case. The other party still has the right of refusal. If they still do not wish to sign the contract after reading it, that is a choice available to them. If they choose to sign the contract without reading it...well...many people are bad at contracts...not the least of whom, are often banks.