23 ms·

> Then your talent is the ability to work hard. That's not necessarily a talent. You can get it from practice.

by praptak 17y ago

codexon 17y ago
Can you get better by practicing? Sure. But is this enough to put you on the same level as people who naturally enjoy doing it? I don't think so. There's a reason for the saying "you either like it or you don't". Forcing yourself to like something you naturally dislike (such as doing taxes) by doing it over and over again is more likely to make you hate it and stop doing it. I realize that it is 2am and I’m exhausted physically so I should go to bed, but mentally I feel on fire. This doesn't happen to very many people.
- Slashed 17y ago
  >>I realize that it is 2am and I’m exhausted physically so I should go to bed, but mentally I feel on fire. This doesn't happen to very many people. It happened to me before all the time. But for some reason I can't do it any more. Now, I have to force myself. Does it mean I wasted my talent? I hope not. This laziness started when I took a year off from writing any code or doing any job and was just having fun with my friends I haven't seen a few years, travelling, etc.. I guess, the only way to get back on the track is to practice. And I think that most people had this flow when they could work for 30h/day, if so to speak.
  - deleted 17y ago
    [deleted]
- mtoledo 17y ago
  There's plenty of people that enjoy doing things but don't do it very well. Enjoying something helps you stick to it more, but it doesnt' make you better at it alone.
bd 17y ago
The ability to work hard seems to be even more talent-based than being smart. Executive functions [1] are supposed to be highly heritable, more so than the intelligence [2]. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_functions http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_functions [2] http://scienceblogs.com/developingintelligence/2008/05/99_genetic_individual_differen.php http://scienceblogs.com/developingintelligence/2008/05/99_ge...
- RK 17y ago
  One of the guys I went to grad school with a was just an obsessive worker. He was the kind of person who could not sleep if a problem was left unsolved. I remember thinking that it would take more effort for him to work as (relatively) little as I did, than for me to work as hard as he did. He also finished a couple years earlier than most of the people we started with...
- deleted 17y ago
  [deleted]

> Then your talent is the ability to work hard. That's not necessarily a talent. You can get it from practice.

by praptak 17y ago

> Then your talent is the ability to work hard. That's not necessarily a talent. You can get it from practice.

Can you get better by practicing? Sure. But is this enough to put you on the same level as people who naturally enjoy doing it? I don't think so. There's a reason for the saying "you either like it or you don't". Forcing yourself to like something you naturally dislike (such as doing taxes) by doing it over and over again is more likely to make you hate it and stop doing it. I realize that it is 2am and I’m exhausted physically so I should go to bed, but mentally I feel on fire. This doesn't happen to very many people.

Slashed 17y ago
>>I realize that it is 2am and I’m exhausted physically so I should go to bed, but mentally I feel on fire. This doesn't happen to very many people. It happened to me before all the time. But for some reason I can't do it any more. Now, I have to force myself. Does it mean I wasted my talent? I hope not. This laziness started when I took a year off from writing any code or doing any job and was just having fun with my friends I haven't seen a few years, travelling, etc.. I guess, the only way to get back on the track is to practice. And I think that most people had this flow when they could work for 30h/day, if so to speak.
- deleted 17y ago
  [deleted]
mtoledo 17y ago
There's plenty of people that enjoy doing things but don't do it very well. Enjoying something helps you stick to it more, but it doesnt' make you better at it alone.

bd 17y ago

The ability to work hard seems to be even more talent-based than being smart. Executive functions [1] are supposed to be highly heritable, more so than the intelligence [2]. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_functions http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_functions [2] http://scienceblogs.com/developingintelligence/2008/05/99_genetic_individual_differen.php http://scienceblogs.com/developingintelligence/2008/05/99_ge...

RK 17y ago
One of the guys I went to grad school with a was just an obsessive worker. He was the kind of person who could not sleep if a problem was left unsolved. I remember thinking that it would take more effort for him to work as (relatively) little as I did, than for me to work as hard as he did. He also finished a couple years earlier than most of the people we started with...
deleted 17y ago
[deleted]