10 ms·
I don't really disagree. For the strongest form of the author's argument; that no other system will suffice, ever; it has to be pathological. If I offered you
by 6d0debc071 11y ago
I don't really disagree.
For the strongest form of the author's argument; that no other system will suffice, ever; it has to be pathological. If I offered you a nice existence with entertaining leisure activities, would your response honestly be to spend the next ten years of your life lobbying for more of the pie? That's a lot of effort to expend - probably without any significant payoff since the return on happiness in terms of extra money drops off - when you could be enjoying yourself instead.
You don't need heaven if people aren't that greedy, (and in my experience - UK based - most people aren't.) Some finite set of resource will suffice.
- ArkyBeagle 11y agoIt's reasonably clear that the people who do go beyond are either just lucky or they just like that process more than enjoying the fruits of their labor. Charles Koch was interviewed recently, and he apparently believes strongly that creating consumer surplus is more moral than not working.