2 ms·
It's obviously better than paper encyclopedia, but it still has problems, notably on editorial censure, more sensible in some countries/languages of wikipedia t
by informatimago 11y ago
It's obviously better than paper encyclopedia, but it still has problems, notably on editorial censure, more sensible in some countries/languages of wikipedia than others. For example, some pages about persons or political parties can be written in English, but not in the language of the country of those persons or groups.
What I'd want to have eventually, is to remove the editorial process, by having an automated process (probably AI based) collecting information and facts about the world (possibly using any connected device and sensor) to build and publish pages about any public (ie. not private) information.
All information about everything.