4 ms·
It sort of makes sense. Systemd has many utilities which can replace stuff from Busybox. And Busybox contains its own init system.
by jkot 11y ago
It sort of makes sense. Systemd has many utilities which can replace stuff from Busybox. And Busybox contains its own init system.
- raverbashing 11y agoCorrect Also, most of systems using busybox shouldn't be running Systemd (or any other 'new' init system to be honest)
- mangix 11y agouhhhh procd?
- bbanyc 11y agoWhat about initrd? Most of those use busybox and it's now "recommended" to start systemd there. (Granted, I don't see why anyone would run busybox's syslog - the only component affected by this change - in an initrd.)
- thwarted 11y agoIf you want an extremely small system, you can put everything you need into the initrd. It's not strictly an initrd then, since it's not really used for bootstrapping a larger system image.
- rawdisk 11y agoThis is the only way I use Linux. I will use the Linux kernel (although it is not my favorite kernel). But I am interested very little in GNU userlands and all the idiosyncracies, complexity and politics that comes with them.