3 ms·
To be fair, that first story ends by saying forChan is "truly innocuous until you enter a web address in the URL field", that removing it would "set yet another
by pauldino 17y ago
To be fair, that first story ends by saying forChan is "truly innocuous until you enter a web address in the URL field", that removing it would "set yet another dangerous precedent", and that Safari "does exactly what forChan does".
- mechanical_fish 17y agowhile the developer mentions that it could be used to browse pictures of fully naked girls—and has some boards with that kind of pictures... There's your difference. Apple takes pains not to brand Safari as an app for surfing porn. For example, I don't think I've ever seen an Apple site explain just what "Private Browsing" mode is designed for... ;) If you want to do business with Apple you've got to think about such things.