I appreciate this! Sometimes articles don't convey 'this is old technology...that researchers are still refining', instead they tend to be sensational. It's nic

I appreciate this! Sometimes articles don't convey 'this is old technology...that researchers are still refining', instead they tend to be sensational. It's nice to know that this was an older research project (2012, not 2015). I'd rather read sober reporting than to be hyped up on the 'next big thing'. Your citation does this, which is why I appreciate it.