3 ms·
> "open sourced" was a C header file [...] Indeed. In my opinion too little to call it a day, but I haven't worked on implementing file handling, so I may be w
by dozzie 11y ago
> "open sourced" was a C header file [...]
Indeed. In my opinion too little to call it a day, but I haven't worked on
implementing file handling, so I may be wrong here.
> An implementation could be considered one way of providing a format/protocol specification.
Not quite. Look at OpenVPN, which has hilarious situation: code is open, but
protocol is effectively closed. You can't practically derive the protocol from
OpenVPN's source (yes, I tried that). Unless you can put weeks of effort, of
course.
- analognoise 11y agoSo it's a closed protocol because it's hard to understand? That doesn't seem to make much sense.
- dozzie 11y agoNo. It's closed because there's no specification or even an alternative implementation and you can't easily derive one.