5 ms·
This is exactly the choice that David Brin presented in "The Transparent Society" back in 1996: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.12/fftransparent.html http:
by randomwalker 17y ago
This is exactly the choice that David Brin presented in "The Transparent Society" back in 1996: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.12/fftransparent.html http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.12/fftransparent.html
Ubiquitous surveillance is inevitable. The question is whether it is going to be whether or not the citizenry will have the same power that the authorities do. Technology is not the barrier; it is a matter of fighting for our legal rights.
The contrast is stark. One path is Orwellian, whereas the other path, while eroding some comforts that we're used to, promises us benefits that will more than compensate for it.
- th0ma5 17y agonot only are more of us intimidating each other subtly and slowly through social grooming on social sites, aren't we also complicit in this surveillance as voters?