6 ms·
It's not considered cheating for the Language Benchmarks Game, seeing as it's just a game, but it would probably be considered cheating for a benchmark attempti
by jakevn 11y ago
It's not considered cheating for the Language Benchmarks Game, seeing as it's just a game, but it would probably be considered cheating for a benchmark attempting to compare performance for "realistic" programs.
- igouy 11y ago>>it's just a game<< http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/sometimes-people-just-make-up-stuff.html#name-game http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/sometimes-people-jus... >>"realistic" programs<< For example? "The performance of a benchmark, even if it is derived from a real program, may not help to predict the performance of similar programs that have different hot spots." http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/dont-jump-to-conclusions.html#not-prophesy http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/dont-jump-to-conclus...
- wpietri 11y agoThis sort of querulous point-sniping mainly persuades me that the criticisms are entirely valid. So if you're looking to make people think that the Benchmarks Game has some real-world utility, you might want to try a different approach.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- igouy 11y agoTo be persuaded on such grounds is unfortunate, when relevant information is before you.
- wpietri 11y agoI'll give you points for consistency. But enough relevant information is already before me. With tens of millions of websites, I have no obligation to look carefully at each one to decide it's not for me.
- igouy 11y agoYou have no obligation to persuade yourself "that the criticisms are entirely valid" without seeing what's being discussed.
- wpietri 11y agoYes, exactly. In the same way that if I see bad Yelp reviews and the business owner responds poorly, I think there's no need to go by for a sandwich just to be sure.
- igouy 11y agoIs it pointing to the FAQ that you consider "responds poorly", or is it pointing to Veedrac's refusal to be unambiguous?