3 ms·
No, settlers weren't willing to give up so much, those people went on to colonize America precisely because they had so little to lose. They were already endur
by yongjik 11y ago
No, settlers weren't willing to give up so much, those people went on to colonize America precisely because they had so little to lose. They were already enduring poverty, hardship, and (in many cases) discrimination to such a degree that crossing the ocean and starting a new life in an unknown land inhabited with hostile indigenous tribes seemed a good enough deal in comparison.
In other words, imagine a developer in India who wants to move to SV but can't get a visa. Can he instead apply for a ship bound to Mars, and agree to work as an IT technician in lieu of paying for the trip (and all the food, water, and oxygen he will need in Mars)?
Until that is economically feasible, colonization of Mars will not happen, at least not in the same way colonization of America happened.
- AnimalMuppet 11y agoThere's a bunch of people right now who are willing to risk death at sea to try to get from Syria to Europe. A fair number of them would probably accept a one-way ticket to Mars, even with the risk it involves.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- yongjik 11y agoIt's the other side of the equation that's missing. Somebody has to be making money selling a one-way ticket to Mars to a desperate refugee. As for now, I doubt even Bill Gates' whole wealth could buy a single ticket to Mars.