5 ms·
Fuck no. That movie sucked.
by alansmitheebk 11y ago
Fuck no. That movie sucked.
- malux85 11y agoI've only just started getting into horror, can you give some suggestions? :)
- reactor4 11y agoI suggest Sinister: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1922777/?ref_=nv_sr_1 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1922777/?ref_=nv_sr_1
- HaloZero 11y agoAlien & Aliens The Orphanage The Shining The Exorcist Dawn of the Dead The Fly The Thing Ringu Halloween Silence of the Lambs Rosemary Baby The Others Should see but not necessarily must: Village of the Damned
- catshirt 11y agoi exercise my own blatant disregard for syntax and grammar rules but christ man, try a comma.
- derekp7 11y agoI would add Phantasm to the list. Not necessarily the sequels, just the original.
- mrob 11y agoPeople have recommended The Cabin in the Woods, and it's a great movie, but I suggest you hold off watching it until you've seen a lot of other horror movies. It relies on you being familiar with the cliches and genre conventions for it to work.
- k__ 11y agoWell, you could watch it first and see how many horror-movies are devoid of creativity ;)
- thomnottom 11y agoI agree. Great movie, but you miss a lot if you don't know the history.
- strictnein 11y agoEvent Horizon
- kozhevnikov 11y agohttps://www.reelscary.com/ https://www.reelscary.com/
- thomnottom 11y agoI don't know true classic horror, but would absolutely suggest John Carpenter's Halloween and The Thing as starting points. I still view them as two of the greatest I've ever seen. I would also put Alien up there (horror/sci-fi). For recent ones, It Follows and The Ba-ba-dook were phenomenal. As for Blair Witch... when I saw it in theaters, people were literally laughing at it.
- Raphmedia 11y agoBetteridge's law of headlines is an adage that states: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no."
- dhimes 11y agoI disagree. That movie was groundbreaking for its style and budget.
- gnaritas 11y agoOnly the style really counts; being massively profitable due to the low budget doesn't make it a great movie. And as to the "lost footage" style, I've always disliked that style and find it ruins any movie it's used in. Shaking cameras are not a feature, they're a bug that was fixed long ago.
- dhimes 11y agoWhile I respect your opinion on the fitness of the style for telling a story, that particular movie is the one that launched the style into its current popularity. Right or wrong, when you change the direction of your field you get major props.
- gnaritas 11y agoOf course, that's why I said only the style really counts. I don't like the style, but it did inspire a slew of followers so it gets respect for a distinctive new style. You just can't count the budget as a reason to call something a groundbreaking horror movie, style yes, budget, no.
- dhimes 11y agoDisagree there also. Bringing the budget down lowers the barrier to entry for other players. Budget, yes.
- gnaritas 11y agoThat's a business achievement attractive to filmmakers and has nothing to do with the classic'ness of the film to moviegoers. No one is going to do a review on a film and say "wow, you know what made that a great movie, the budget". Anyway, I don't care, I've already talked about this bad movie more than I ever care to. I don't mind to never hear of it again.