3 ms·

Ummm, no. I don't deny different forms of logic. I'm telling you that you can't know anything or say something is rational or irrational with conventions of lo

Ummm, no. I don't deny different forms of logic. I'm telling you that you can't know anything or say something is rational or irrational with conventions of logic. I'm also pointing out your treating laws of logic like laws (yay! I commend you for treating them like laws), but you are coming from a worldview that doesn't allow for laws (boo! inconsistency!). This is where materialists bow out because they don't want to dig too deeply into their presuppositions.

gnaritas 11y ago
> I'm telling you that you can't know anything or say something is rational or irrational with conventions of logic. Stawman, that point is not in dispute. > but you are coming from a worldview that doesn't allow for laws (boo! inconsistency!). No I'm not. Your notion that materialism doesn't allow logic is simply wrong. You don't know what materialism is and I'm tired of repeating myself on that point why you continue to skirt the issue and ignore that. > This is where materialists bow out because they don't want to dig too deeply into their presuppositions. No, they bow out because you're clearly irrational and unable to engage in meaningful conversation because you don't address points being made to you. You just ignore them and keep saying the same non-sense that's being challenged.