5 ms·
Is My Cat Right- or Left-Handed? (2009)
- chris_wot 11y agoDeborah Wells and Sarah Millsopp should seriously consider teaming up with the guys who patented a method of inducing aerobic exercise in an unrestrained cat.
- sobkas 11y ago>not smart enough to figure out how to obtain it. Or smart enough to avoid being a subject of some strange experiment.
- derekp7 11y agoThat was the author's next point, that the cat knows she doesn't have to work too hard to get the food, as the human will make it available in short order.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- Kiro 11y agoI was... expecting something more.
- GPGPU 11y agoMy cat has paws, not hands. And thank God for that, too, otherwise she'd get into too much trouble.
- Frenchgeek 11y agoWell, cats don't have hands, so that's pretty easy to answer...
- whateveracct 11y agoCats use their front paws in some very hand-like ways. They can even grip with their toes.
- Frenchgeek 11y agoYes, but I don't get to be a smartass if you call them hands.
- bostonaholic 11y agoMy wife and I ran an experiment to find this out on our cat, too. He already uses his paws to reach into several narrow cups to pull out food; so this was nothing out of the ordinary for him. What we did was, put food in 1 cup and watched as he continually used his left paw. Then, we rotated the device so the cup with food was against the wall and difficult to reach with his left paw; hoping this would force him to use his right paw. Wrong. He rotated his body and walked to the other side so he could use his left paw. We rotated again as did he. We've done this several times now and he always moves his body instead of just simply using his right paw.
- WildUtah 11y agoThe Smithsonian article is bad. The writer doesn't even try hard to get her cat to do the experiment and has no results. Better story in the linked original article in New Scientist: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17510-is-your-cat-left-or-right-pawed https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17510-is-your-cat-lef... And the abstract of the original study, since the whole article is behind a ridiculous paywall, part of the typical Elsevier scam of blocking science: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347209002644 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347209...