3 ms·

It's not a direct replacement for asynchronous, as reactive implies quite a different set of semantics. The collision is only in your misunderstanding of the pa

It's not a direct replacement for asynchronous, as reactive implies quite a different set of semantics. The collision is only in your misunderstanding of the pattern. The jargon is meaningful, not marketing.

fredliu 11y ago
Good to know. Then the "reactive" mentioned in the title is not exactly async, and not exactly as in "Reactive Extensions" either, so where can I find the intended meaning of "reactive" in that context?
kpil 11y ago
Reactive is "things happen, I don't need to know, async". Right?