3 ms·
Evolution doesn't have a direction, it's an explanation of a thing that happens. Diversity in the gene pool is almost certainly a plus for the long-term surviv
by jegutman 11y ago
Evolution doesn't have a direction, it's an explanation of a thing that happens. Diversity in the gene pool is almost certainly a plus for the long-term survival of the species, but it's marginal, must like everything that would determine the long-term survival of the species.
Almost all diseases that happen after a species' reproductive age is very difficult to select out either in a positive or negative way unless it happens to be strongly genetically linked (either through sharing genes or being very close on a chromosome) to a different positive or negative trait. Even then in the long run the survival of that trait will be dominated by its independent characteristics.
The way to flip this around is that you could also look at the "survival" of the disease, disorder, etc. Not that we WANT these to survive, but they either will or won't. If a disease causes death 100% of the time at age 2 and provides no other benefits in the carrier / recessive trait it tends not to last in the gene pool for very long.
- liamconnell 11y ago> Almost all diseases that happen after a species' reproductive age is very difficult to select out either in a positive or negative way unless it happens to be strongly genetically linked (either through sharing genes or being very close on a chromosome) to a different positive or negative trait. Well that's not entirely true. I think humans evolved (and still evolve) on a tribal level. So an individual's traits that strengthen the tribe are also good for the survival of the tribe since one's entire gene pool would be wiped if the neighboring tribe killed all of you, even if the individual is post-reproductive age. I find that most people never talk about evolution on a tribal level like this.