2 ms·
Yes but even on your own network, you can't trust wifi, unless you live in a Faraday cage.
by ck2 11y ago
Yes but even on your own network, you can't trust wifi, unless you live in a Faraday cage.
- dogma1138 11y agoReally depends on the network you setup, yes the traffic can be picked over the air but if you secure the network sufficiently and only trusted devices are connected to it is trustworthy. People will not be easily breaking WPA2, if you rotate your keys, and implement other security measures such as RAPD or .x1 your threat agents change from anyone with a cellphone to very well funded and "armed" adversaries.
- simoncion 11y ago> ...but even on your own network, you can't trust wifi... WPA2 Enterprise uses AES for per-client session key generation, and -when you use EAP-TLS or EAP-TTLS- TLS for transportation of client credentials and assurance that both ends of the conversation are who they say they are. [0] You can make WiFi just as secure as wired Ethernet, it just takes a -surprisingly small- bit of work. :) If Windows and Mac machines supported EAP-PWD, or (even better) WFA-TLS-UNAUTH [1] even coffeeshop WiFi would be secure from passive attack. [0] When you use WiFi client and RADIUS server certs, rather than just username and password. [1] EAP offers a very large array of authentication methods. EAP-PWD authenticates with just a username and password and doesn't muck about with TLS certs. WFA-TLS-UNAUTH uses TLS, but doesn't verify the RADIUS server cert and doesn't require a client cert. Both of these schemes offer substantially less assurance than full-blown EAP-[T]TLS, but they also let you offer encrypted WiFi without hassle.