3 ms·

Why not name the company? I'm going to be honest..I don't think this actually happened.

• pavornyoh 11y ago
  >Why not name the company? Perhaps fear? Maybe they don't want to become an object of ridicule
  • kelukelugames 11y ago
    He was the object of ridicule. Things cannot get worse for him unless the company is committed to ruining its reputation. Then again someone companies have been known to release personal information when threatened.
• albertoleal 11y ago
  >Why not name the company? I'm going to guess OP may be 'liable' for damaging the company's reputation.
  • kelukelugames 11y ago
    No, not liable if this is true. The recruiter being fired is easily provable. It will add weight to the rest of the story.
• sjs382 11y ago
  Telling the name privately or in a casual conversation is one thing, publishing the name is one thing. While I wish I knew the company's name (or knew their side of the story) I don't fault him for not sharing.