4 ms·
Not just political views. Most people would agree that mentally ill people should not have children. But what constitutes mentally ill? The line is fuzzy - pe
by jazzyk 11y ago
Not just political views.
Most people would agree that mentally ill people should not have children.
But what constitutes mentally ill? The line is fuzzy - perhaps someone is just a bit "quirky", but still could be a good parent?
In order to have a license the criteria would have to be crystal clear and added to the Constitution (sorry, US-centric). And even if in the Constitution, someone could abuse it (see: NSA, surveillance).
- arbitrage 11y ago> Most people would agree that mentally ill people should not have children. It is vastly oversimplifying, and prejudicial, to say something like that. Many more people than you seem to think have experienced, or will experience mental illness in their life. http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/prevalence/any-mental-illness-ami-among-adults.shtml http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/prevalence/any-men...
- Infinitesimus 11y agoI could be wrong but I thought that was the point parent comment was making? > Most people would agree that mentally ill people should not have children. Turns out the definition of mental illness covers far more than the most extreme/visible cases so it will be unclear where to draw the line since "mental illness" is too broad a set
- jazzyk 11y agoYou are correct - that was my point!
- ZenoArrow 11y ago> "Not just political views." Yes, not just political views. As you say, the mentally ill would be one targeted group, former criminals would be another, etc... The most divisive issue would probably be whether those living in poverty would be given the license. > "In order to have a license the criteria would have to be crystal clear and added to the Constitution (sorry, US-centric). And even if in the Constitution, someone could abuse it (see: NSA, surveillance)." At most, I could imagine the benefits of taking precautions against accidental pregnancies (vasectomies, etc...), but only as long as those measures would be reversible at any time. I could also see the need for encouraging single child families as the least draconian method of population control (should overpopulation ever become a big issue). Anything beyond that strikes me as a step too far.
- nsxwolf 11y agoMost people would agree that mentally ill people should not have children. Huh? They would? Are you sure about that?