2 ms·
The wall being made of reinforced concrete also kills a few use cases. But human detection isn't hopeless in general. You can do pretty well (even gender distin
by Jach 11y ago
The wall being made of reinforced concrete also kills a few use cases. But human detection isn't hopeless in general. You can do pretty well (even gender distinction) by having a physically based model of what you're expecting, e.g. humans, on the ground level instead of at some angle, within a certain range, potentially moving but you can detect heartbeats too, and there are models of how the human body behaves at rest and while moving. (Edit: the assumption of movement really helps a lot since you can diff samples and subtract out all the static bits. So even if clothing attenuates the signal by x%, x < 100, if the human's the only thing in the scene that's moving you're ok.)
(I'm actually impressed/jealous with what they accomplished since it was something I tried and failed to do alone for a school project based on http://ocw.mit.edu/resources/res-ll-003-build-a-small-radar-system-capable-of-sensing-range-doppler-and-synthetic-aperture-radar-imaging-january-iap-2011/ http://ocw.mit.edu/resources/res-ll-003-build-a-small-radar-...)