4 ms·
Dig deeper and you will find that while this is the law, it is not necessarily reality. Hence why I structured the question the way I did rather than focusing o
by mratzloff 11y ago
Dig deeper and you will find that while this is the law, it is not necessarily reality. Hence why I structured the question the way I did rather than focusing on the legal requirement.
A new government report shows that charter schools are not enrolling as high a portion of special-education students as traditional public schools, despite federal laws mandating that publicly financed schools run by private entities take almost every disabled student seeking to enroll.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303379204577477003893836734 http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB100014240527023033792045774770...
- ThomPete 11y agoThere are many things that aren't reality when you dig deeper. Public schools are no different. Again. Trying to make charter schools the bad schools in defence of the public shools is simply absurd.
- mratzloff 11y agoYou're correct, but that's not what I did.
- ThomPete 11y agoOf course it is. Otherwise your point is trivial. Some schools don't live up to their obligation. No shit.
- mratzloff 11y agoI'm not sure what your comment added to the discussion. Between this thread and your overall comment history, you strike me as a very argumentative person. When it is a nationwide difference it is not just "some" schools; it is systemic. That doesn't make charter schools the bad guys. That doesn't make public schools the good guys. It does, however, mean that this is a complex issue and charter schools are competing on unequal footing in at least one respect.