I should not have said "very" biased. I also did not mean it as an indictment, only to prep the reader that there may be a bit of a slant. Google can point ou

I should not have said "very" biased. I also did not mean it as an indictment, only to prep the reader that there may be a bit of a slant. Google can point out some allegedly biased reporting they have done [1], but I'm certainly no expert on it. My concern, in this particular case, is that Mother Jones has, by most accounts, a left-leaning bias [2, among others]. Dealership associations have, by most accounts, a right-leaning bias [3, among others]. The conflict there raises my internal alarm when reading them on this issue. Moreover, you can't talk about franchise protections without talking about two major recent presidents during their tenure as governors. That those presidents are generally referred to negatively by MJ (in my personal estimation) and that casting their political legacies in a negative light makes a naturally-appealing target, needs to be considered. That said, I agree with you. I find MJ's articles generally good and I believe their reporting on this issue was very enlightening. [1] https://www.google.com/search?q=mother+jones+bias https://www.google.com/search?q=mother+jones+bias [2] http://www.allsides.com/news-source/mother-jones http://www.allsides.com/news-source/mother-jones [3] http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/news-flash-car-dealers-are-republicans/ http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/news-flash-car-dealers-a...