3 ms·
Maybe a tall order, but if someone has it in them to provide a clear and simple explanation of SMT/SAT at the level of an intrigued layman, that'd be amazing. I
by mbrock 11y ago
Maybe a tall order, but if someone has it in them to provide a clear and simple explanation of SMT/SAT at the level of an intrigued layman, that'd be amazing. I've looked at the Wikipedia pages a few times and always just feel kinda overwhelmed. I'm probably missing the education in formal logic/math to understand why these are fruitful models, but they obviously are. Is this a kind of forefront of artificial reasoning research? What are some examples of problems they can help solve, and approximately what would be involved in modelling those problems within the formalization?
- gsnedders 11y agoThey're a good model in part because they're the most fundamental model of a number of equivalent ones, and the one for which there has been the largest amount of work on creating performant implementations.