4 ms·
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:9Xb-buTsVLoJ:https://adblockplus.org/forum/viewtopic.php%3Ff%3D2%26t%3D41068+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=se http
by SNvD7vEJ 11y ago
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:9Xb-buTsVLoJ:https://adblockplus.org/forum/viewtopic.php%3Ff%3D2%26t%3D41068+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=se http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:9Xb-buT...
- pascalmemories 11y agoAlas, not very helpful, from the top of the Google cache page : This is Google's cache of https://adblockplus.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=41068 https://adblockplus.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=41068. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on 25 Oct 2015 20:18:41 GMT. As the deed was done on 23 October, this version is not much use. Anyone know of an earlier version (or how to get Google to spit out the earlier version it, for sure, has) ?
- jlgaddis 11y agoAs pascalmemories noted, this cached version is "post-takedown" as evidenced by "[Redacted]" in the second posting along with the explicit notice "Filters deleted due to a court injunction we received today." While I didn't see the filters "pre-takedown", a Google search for the URL [0] turns up a number of other places where it was referenced. While I can't verify that they did/do work, at least a few of those results appear to contain filters to defeat the anti-ad-blocking mechanisms put in place by bild.de. (I'm intentionally not reproducing them here in an effort to perhaps save dang from having to respond to a takedown notice.) :/ [0]: https://adblockplus.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=41068 https://adblockplus.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=41068