3 ms·
So they're less risk averse even if they're less competent. Probably right. Though I think there's also something intellectually liberating about having no risk
by vegabook 11y ago
So they're less risk averse even if they're less competent. Probably right. Though I think there's also something intellectually liberating about having no risk constraints, which might allow for attack vectors that are unconventional.
- niels_olson 11y agoWhat you should be really afraid of is 50 year olds without risk aversion. Like the decision-makers at banks, politicians who will never personally go to war or the welfare line, etc.