4 ms·
No, the article says "found human DNA in 2% of the samples", meaning 7 out of 345 samples had the DNA. This implies it's not as common as you suggest.
by jenscow 11y ago
No, the article says "found human DNA in 2% of the samples", meaning 7 out of 345 samples had the DNA.
This implies it's not as common as you suggest.