> So all protesters could be classified as terrorists under this definition? You're heavily stramanning the definition. Nowhere near all protesters endanger hu

> So all protesters could be classified as terrorists under this definition? You're heavily stramanning the definition. Nowhere near all protesters endanger human life, property, or infrastructure, and showing where voting desires are is clearly not what is meant by 'intimidation'. The vast majority of protesters do not do any of these things, hence the vast majority do not satisfy the quoted definition.