4 ms·
>My only option is shady SD streams. It's better than nothing, but I'm willing to throw money at the problem if they'll let me. >I don't have a legal option to
by pflats 11y ago
>My only option is shady SD streams. It's better than nothing, but I'm willing to throw money at the problem if they'll let me.
>I don't have a legal option to watch my team play unless I grab an overpriced cable/satellite plan that I don't want.
Sounds like you do have another option! (DirecTV pays the NFL 1.5 billion dollars a year to be able to offer you that overpriced plan.)
- toxican 11y agoA realistic option, then? I've no use for anything else that DirecTV has to offer. I've got Netflix and Hulu, so I'm set on TV shows and movies. Unless you think paying that much money just to watch football is a realistic option?
- phamilton 11y agoYou'd be surprised at how the cost works out. Bundles exist so expensive content can be subsidized by cheaper content. ESPN costs the provider much more than most channels. In other words, getting ESPN a la carte is going to run you $20-30/month. The other channels in the bundle make it so non sports fans can subsidize your subscription.