This is actually quite creative because it leaves a lot open to ideological interpretation. The author is progressively making a sentence more ambiguous in an a

This is actually quite creative because it leaves a lot open to ideological interpretation. The author is progressively making a sentence more ambiguous in an attempt to deconstruct propaganda, but with the last two images ends on a blatant example of propaganda of their own doing! The difference being many consider the latter to be morally righteous. As such, what is and isn't loaded is in the eye of the beholder. I don't think that was his intention. He likely believed his conclusion was sincere. But that's how I read it, and it becomes even greater for it.