3 ms·
"Species are notoriously local": No they are not. Species are dependent upon habitats for which they are adapted to. If a particular species is extremely loc
by JPKab 11y ago
"Species are notoriously local":
No they are not. Species are dependent upon habitats for which they are adapted to. If a particular species is extremely local, it is strictly because the suitable habitat for their physical characteristics is extremely localized.
This isn't the Galapagos islands. This is the Sahara desert. To suggest that there is some habitat feature in one extremely small section of it that isn't present in others is just plain ridiculous. The main driver of extinction and endangerment in the Sahara has been over hunting by humans. Not habitat loss.