It's silly. Look I think it's fine for FB to do this, it's better than nothing although the resources could be better spent. But at the end of the day, it's not

It's silly. Look I think it's fine for FB to do this, it's better than nothing although the resources could be better spent. But at the end of the day, it's not internet access at all. It's wireless access to a select amount of intranets, basically, including FB and a few partner networks. That's fine, just don't run a campaign about the internet and use a domain like internet.org. Either way, it doesn't really seem to matter. Looks like it's not gaining traction because users want internet, not what is offered. So either they steer the ship towards the goal of providing that, or it dies. I'm sure they're learning tons right now and I'm sure in a few years it'll have improved substantially, so I'm still optimistic.