4 ms·
Agreed. They named it Internet.org but the service is diametrically opposed to the basic principles that make up the Internet as we know it. A far more appropr
by addicted44 11y ago
Agreed. They named it Internet.org but the service is diametrically opposed to the basic principles that make up the Internet as we know it.
A far more appropriate name would have been AOL.org. But that wouldn't have been as good PR and the NYTimss would not be writing about their good intentions if the name of the service was more descriptive of what it actually did.
- x5n1 11y agoAs a staring step force them to rename the service to facebook.org
- tim333 11y agoThey seem to be going that way: "'Free Basics by Facebook' replaces Internet.org website and app" http://www.engadget.com/2015/09/24/free-basics-by-facebook/ http://www.engadget.com/2015/09/24/free-basics-by-facebook/