you are just describing nautil.us's contribution http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v476/n7358/full/nature10289.html http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v47

you are just describing nautil.us's contribution http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v476/n7358/full/nature10289.html http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v476/n7358/full/nature1... by that logic you could reverse it and rant that arxiv.org lacks sufficient fluff